Decoding the Separation Board Process in the Military
Overview of a Separation Board:
​
A separation board in the military, while bearing similarities to a trial, is a distinct process with its own set of rules and structure. Rather than taking place in a traditional courtroom, these proceedings often occur in a conference room and are overseen by a panel of three board members, all of whom outrank the service member involved.
​
The Flow of the Separation Board:
The board commences with opening statements from both the government attorney and your defense attorney, outlining their respective positions and the evidence they plan to present.
​
Presentation of Evidence:
The government attorney leads by submitting documentary evidence and calling witnesses, who may testify either in person or remotely. Following the government's questioning, your defense attorney has the opportunity to cross-examine these witnesses under oath.
​
Once the government rests its case, your defense attorney presents your side of the story, introducing evidence and calling witnesses on your behalf. The government attorney is then afforded the same cross-examination rights.
​
​
Testifying on Your Own Behalf:
As the service member in question, you have the option to testify, though it is not mandatory. If you choose to testify, you can do so either as a sworn or unsworn witness. Sworn testimony means you are under oath and subject to cross-examination by both the government attorney and questioning by the board members. In contrast, an unsworn testimony allows you to speak without an oath, answer your attorney's questions, and then withdraw without facing cross-examination.
Closing Statements and Deliberations:
Following the testimonies, both attorneys deliver their closing statements, summarizing the evidence and arguing for or against separation and the terms thereof.
The board then deliberates to reach a decision, which is typically communicated on the same day. Their deliberation involves determining whether the alleged misconduct occurred, whether it warrants separation, and, if so, under what characterization of service.
​
Understanding the Burden of Proof:
It's crucial to understand that a separation board is not a criminal trial. The most significant difference lies in the burden of proof. Unlike in a criminal trial, where the prosecution must establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, a separation board operates on a 'preponderance of the evidence' standard. This means the government attorney needs to show only that there is a greater than 50% chance that the misconduct occurred, 51%, a considerably lower threshold.
Given this lower burden of proof, having an experienced and adept defense attorney who is well-versed in the nuances of separation boards becomes even more critical to effectively defend against potential separation.
​
Navigating Testimony Choices at a Board of Inquiry or Administrative Separation Board
Understanding Your Testimony Options:
If you're an officer facing a Board of Inquiry (BOI) or an enlisted member confronting an Administrative Separation Board, one of your most critical decisions is how to approach your testimony. This article provides insights into the options at your disposal and the implications of each, from an experienced military defense attorney.
​
Standard Witness Procedure vs. Respondent's Rights:
Typically, all witnesses at these separation boards testify under oath, affirming their commitment to honesty before proceeding with questioning. However, as the respondent - not a defendant - in these proceedings, you're afforded unique choices thanks to your due process rights.
Option 1: Choosing Silence:
Your constitutional right against self-incrimination allows you to remain silent during the board. This option might be suitable for various reasons, ranging from personal discomfort in speaking publicly to strategic considerations, especially if facing parallel civilian legal proceedings. It's essential to note that the board is instructed not to interpret your silence negatively.
Option 2: Sworn Statement:
Giving a sworn statement aligns your testimony with that of other witnesses. This involves taking an oath and undergoing questioning by your attorney, followed by cross-examination from the government attorney and possible inquiries from board members. This approach can be intimidating, as it subjects you to rigorous scrutiny, making preparation and poise crucial. Never opt for a sworn statement without thorough preparation with your attorney.
Option 3: Unsworn Statement:
Unique to the respondent is the option of an unsworn statement. Here, you can present your narrative without the formality of an oath. The advantage? You're not subject to cross-examination or questioning by the board after your statement. While this might frustrate the board members who cannot query you, it’s a legally protected right that a skilled attorney can reinforce effectively. Preparation is just as vital for an unsworn statement, which can be delivered orally, in writing, or through a combination, often involving a Q&A format with your attorney.
Choosing the Best Approach:
While every case is distinct, the unsworn statement often emerges as a preferred choice due to its reduced risk and the inability of the board to directly question you. Expert legal guidance is indispensable in navigating this decision and ensuring your rights are clearly communicated to the board.
Conclusion: The Power of Informed Decision-Making:
Deciding whether to testify and in what manner is a decision that rests solely with you. However, it's imperative to weigh this choice under the guidance of an experienced attorney familiar with every facet of your case. Making an informed decision in this regard is pivotal to your representation at a Board of Inquiry or Administrative Separation Board.